After reading an article on interview with Prof. Hiroaki Koide, I was surprised to learn that he shares the same opinion that much.
I am different from him only in that he says “We should eat contaminated good in order to save farmers.” It’s my understanding that Prof. Koide’s mercifulness had him make a wrong judgment.
December 2, 2012
English translation of an excerpt from a Japanese article: Soon the northern wind will blow – December 1, 2012 –
Prof. Koide November 29 “Nuclear Power Plants and Politics/Politicians”
Interview with Prof. Hiroaki Koide on November 29 by Mr. Yasumi Iwakami: Transcript from “kiikochan.blog”
Iwakami: I do understand well that you don’t want to commit yourself to politics. Apart from other policies, I’d like to ask you what you think about nuclear power plant policy.
Koide: Well, I don’t like politics. It is because people like Mr. Hashimoto are politicians.
Koide: In a word, he has no basic policy at all.
At one time, he said, “I’m against nuclear power plants.” However, he easily ate his words. He loves someone strong. He wants himself to be strong and loves someone strong.
He curries favor with Mr. Ishihara who seems to be stronger and cozies up to him, abandoning his commitment to denuclearization. He seems to be that kind of person. I feel that as long as such person engages in politics, I have no hope for it. Therefore, I want to keep my distance from politicians as much as possible.
Koide: Although it is not a very nice way to put it, he always says something to get to be popular among the public. If he considers it ineffective, he throws it away. He thinks it realistic.
Iwakami: I see. When he mentioned “to abandon nuclear power generation,” he sensed how the public felt to win popularity.
Koide: He lacked coherence at the time of restarting the Ohi nuclear power plant, too.
Yielding to the threat of “possible blackout,” he made a slip of the tongue and said, “It is over” and “I’m defeated.” We had no blackout. I thought that he should fight bravely. Well, it shows that he is such type of person by his nature.
Iwakami: As for Mr. Shintato Ishihara, he mentions not only the promotion of nuclear power generation but the discussion about the possession of nuclear weapons.
The Senkaku territory issue came up. It was Mr. Shintaro Ishihara that ignited the dispute. His remarks made the relations with China soured and changed the domestic atmosphere.
In this situation, he quit the Tokyo governorship and tried to embark on national politics. What is your evaluation of his political stance?
Koide: Mr. Ishihara loves someone strong much better than Mr. Hashimoto does. I think that he probably wants to control this country and also the world with power.
I think that his way of thinking is basically wrong, and I have wanted people like him not to engage in politics and my opinion is the same as before.
Iwakami: Do you think that possession of nuclear weapons is realistically possible?
Koide: Yes, of course. “Use of nuclear power plants for power generation, not for nuclear weapons” was the first official reason, but to begin with, a prime reason for Japan to get involved in nuclear power was for nuclear weapons.
Koide: Some two years ago, NHK broadcasted a program “Japan that needs nuclear weapons.”
It was a program which describes what intention Japan had in the 1960s when the country rushed headlong into nuclear power; the intention was clarified by collection of testimony of the diplomats at the time, diplomatic documents and testimony of diplomats of a foreign country, Germany.
“Japan should always be prepared to have nuclear weapons” was Japan’s intention.
Then document says that it should be made known to the public.
I think it indicates that finally Japan has started teaching the public the fact that “Japan should also have nuclear weapons.”
Iwakami: The recent move toward this….
Koide: Considering the fact that NHK produced such program…
Iwakami: The LDP also proposed to revise the Constitution and make the SDF the national armed forces. These will lead to approving the use of Japan’s right of collective self-defense, under which Japan can be mobilized as U.S. subcontractor and also to putting an emphasis on “nuclear weapons.”
What do you think of LDP’s stance?
Koide: They have had a consistent stance.
Koide: The LDP wants to immediately revise the Constitution. Especially Mr. Abe was at the head of advocates of constitutional amendment. If LDP should take on the next administration, Japan will direct its course all the more toward revising the Constitution, never abandoning nuclear power and reviving it.
Iwakami: For example, the Senkaku Islands issue, the tense relations between Japan and China or U.S. commitment to it. What do you think?
Koide: All we have to do is to get back to the spirit of a constitution. Take for example the Constitution of Japan. As you know well, the Article 9 says that “The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.”
The article prescribes clearly: In order to accomplish it, land, sea and air forces will never be maintained. As Japan declares “it will ban the use of force as means of settling international conflicts,” Japan only has to observe the constitution.
First of all, we have to stop being subject state to any countries.
Iwakami: It lasted only for a few days, but there was a move where each force got together to form a third force of center-liberals.
A party was formed with Shiga Governor Kada as leader and Mr. Tetsuya Iida as acting leader. The People’s Life First and the Anti-Nuclear Power formed by Mr. Kamei and Mr. Yamada, which has not yet a political party, have joined the party.
What do you think of this move?
Or what do you think about Ms. Kada as leader?
Koide: In the two-party system, we had to choose either DPJ or LDP. However, either party is not good.
I think that we should immediately abandon nuclear power. Either party is not good. The party formed by Mr. Hashimoto and Mr. Ishihara is not good, either.
Then I had wished that some organization, where those who have tried to stop nuclear power plant operation are accepted, could be created. Therefore, I feel grateful for Ms. Kada who has created such organization.
To stop nuclear power plant operation is not only the problem of nuclear reactors but relates to “what type of society to build.” I’d like to thank her for making it a top priority to “stop nuclear power plant operation.” I hope Ms. Kada and others will participate actively in politics.
Iwakami: Mr. Ozawa immediately disbanded his own party “People’s Life First” and made an about-turn to join the Mirai no To (Tomorrow Party) which tried to form alliances with this goal of getting Japan out of nuclear power.
What do you think of Mr. Ozawa as politician?
Koide: I originally dislike the strong. So,…
Koide: I think that a society seeking the strong is rotten in the first place. Like Mr. Hashimoto and Mr. Ishihara who want to get strong and yearn for the strong, many people seem to “expect some strong leaders to appear.” I think this is wrong. Rather, it is important for each of us to live with clear self-awareness as sovereign member of society. I think that “we should not seek strong leaders.”
In that sense, Mr. Ozawa is one of strong leaders.
As long as I hear his recent comments, I think he is very respectable.
He is respectable because he has got to definitely give his opinion and claim to “opposition to nuclear power.”
With regard to the current move, he swiftly disbanded his party and decided to merge into Mirai no To, which tries to mobilize people with policy centering on denuclearization. He is indeed a competent politician.
However, as I say many times, I have no trust in politics. As he has engaged in politics for many years, Mr. Ozawa might change his attitude in political world in future. Therefore, I am not completely free of uncertainty about him.